New post: AI raised the price of not knowing things

Fifty physicians got GPT-4 in a randomized trial. Their diagnostic scores moved two points. The model alone scored 92.

That gap is today's post. ETH Zurich learning scientist Manu Kapur argues the better AI gets, the more your foundations are worth, because the whole game moved from getting answers to judging them. The post breaks down the trial, the two subjects Kapur says just got a raise (math and philosophy, of all things), and the Core Grammar Drill: four SeedStacking phases, 80 minutes, ending with a personal miss rate log almost nobody using AI can produce.

Read it, then tell me: what is one claim AI handed you this week that you accepted without checking? Mine was a citation. It held, barely.

https://www.harvestkernel.com/ai-foundational-knowledge-core-grammar/