Monday question, and it takes one sentence.

This morning's post is about the brief unsealed last week in the case against OpenAI and Microsoft, where Microsoft's CEO agreed under oath that chatbots give people the information instead of sending them to the source. For anyone who assigns readings, that is a design problem, not a discipline problem.

The fix I keep coming back to is small: build one class session around the passage a summary drops. The qualification, the example, the turn in the argument, or the author's voice.

So, one sentence: which reading this term would you least want your students to meet only as a summary?